Ufs 22 Vs Emmc 51 Link Extra Quality -
Can struggle with stuttering when installing an app while trying to use another.
| Feature | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | Parallel (8-bit) | Serial (LVDS) | | Duplex Mode | Half-duplex (Read or Write) | Full-duplex (Simultaneous R/W) | | Command Queue | Simple FIFO (No Command Queuing) | Tagged Command Queuing (TCQ) | | Theoretical Max Speed | 400 MB/s (HS400 mode) | 1200 MB/s (HS-Gear3 x2 lane) | | Real-World Seq. Read | ~250 - 330 MB/s | ~850 - 1000 MB/s | | Real-World Seq. Write | ~125 - 290 MB/s | ~250 - 800 MB/s | | Random R/W IOPS | ~11,000 - 33,000 IOPS | Varies, but significantly higher than eMMC | | Key Technologies | Basic Flash Management | Write Booster, Host Performance Booster (HPB) | | Power Efficiency | Moderate | Higher due to faster operation and deep sleep modes | | Target Market | Ultra-budget devices, IoT, simple embedded systems | Mid-range & flagship smartphones, tablets, gaming devices | ufs 22 vs emmc 51 link
Because of the architectural differences in their data links, UFS 2.2 delivers significantly higher data transfer rates than eMMC 5.1. Performance Metric The Performance Difference ~1000 MB/s UFS 2.2 is 4x faster Sequential Write UFS 2.2 is 3x faster Random Read ~11,000 IOPS ~40,000 IOPS UFS 2.2 is 3.6x faster Random Write ~13,000 IOPS ~40,000 IOPS UFS 2.2 is 3x faster Command Queuing (NCQ) Can struggle with stuttering when installing an app
eMMC 5.1, on the other hand, is a type of flash storage that has been widely used in mobile devices for years. It was introduced by the SD Card Association in 2014. eMMC 5.1 is a popular choice for many device manufacturers due to its cost-effectiveness and decent performance. Write | ~125 - 290 MB/s | ~250
In addition to performance and power consumption, both UFS 22 and eMMC 5.1 have their own set of features that set them apart.