Al Kashi Report 176 | Rijal

To fully appreciate the scope of Report 176, one must examine its textual chain, the historical figures it highlights, and the theological ripples it sent through subsequent generations of Islamic scholarship. 1. The Textual Chain (Isnad) and Its Authenticity

Report 176 is a focal point for debate between different schools of thought: Shia Interpretation:

However, I can summarize what is generally known about in Rijal al-Kashi :

To verify any report in ‘Ilm al-Rijal , critics first examine the chain. In Report 176, the chain flows as follows: Rijal Al Kashi Report 176

For those engaged in advanced Shi’a rijal , from Ikhtiyar Ma’rifat al-Rijal (by Shaykh al-Tusi, abridging al-Kashi’s original) serves as a critical data point for understanding how early Imami scholars evaluated narrators associated with Fathism (followers of Abdullah al-Aftah, son of Imam al-Sadiq, peace be upon him).

Individual reports or numbered entries in Rijal al-Kashi typically focus on critical early companions—such as —who transmitted major legal traditions from Imam al-Baqir and Imam al-Sadiq.

This report is famously associated with Ali ibn Abi Hamza al-Bataini . To fully appreciate the scope of Report 176,

: The narrative about Qays ibn Sa d in this report is not just a biographical note but a concise historical document. It provides a Shi'i perspective on the tense political negotiations between Imam al-Hasan (AS) and Mu awiyah, illustrating the internal dynamics among the Imam's followers during a critical moment.

To help narrow down the historical analysis of this specific entry, could you share is the main focus of the version of Report 176 you are researching? Additionally, let me know if you would like me to provide a structural breakdown of al-Kashi's grading methodology or compare it to later biographical works like Rijal al-Tusi. Share public link

His magnum opus was originally titled Kitab Ma'rifat al-Naqilin 'an al-A'imma al-Sadiqin (The Book of Knowing the Transmitters from the Truthful Imams). This original text is now lost, but its core content survives in an abridged version, Ikhtiyar Ma'rifat al-Rijal (The Selection of the Knowledge of the Men), which was later abridged by the renowned Shaykh al-Ta'ifah, Abu Ja'far Muhammad ibn al-Hasan al-Tusi (995-1067). Shaykh Tusi reported that he abridged the work because the original contained "many errors," which Tusi sought to correct. Al-Kashshi's original work is now lost, but parts of it survive in an abridgement made by Shaykh Tusi. In Report 176, the chain flows as follows:

The report features a direct quote or judgment from a foundational authority—often Imam al-Baqir or a highly trusted senior companion like Zurarah ibn A'yan—reproaching or validating the individual in question. Historical and Doctrinal Implications

If you tell me the associated with Report 176 (if you know it), I can help you find the biographical summary and rijāl verdict from reliable secondary sources.

Here is the specific citation information as found in classical and modern sources: