The goal of the Kinetics dataset is to help the computer vision and machine learning communities advance models for video understanding. Given this large human action classification dataset, it may be possible to learn powerful video representations that transfer to different video tasks.
The Kinetics-700-2020 dataset will be used for this challenge. Kinetics-700-2020 is a large-scale, high-quality dataset of YouTube video URLs which include a diverse range of human focused actions. The aim of the Kinetics dataset is to help the machine learning community create more advanced models for video understanding. It is an approximate super-set of both Kinetics-400, released in 2017, Kinetics-600, released in 2018 and Kinetics-700, released in 2019.
The dataset consists of approximately 650,000 video clips, and covers 700 human action classes with at least 700 video clips for each action class. Each clip lasts around 10 seconds and is labeled with a single class. All of the clips have been through multiple rounds of human annotation, and each is taken from a unique YouTube video. The actions cover a broad range of classes including human-object interactions such as playing instruments, as well as human-human interactions such as shaking hands and hugging.
More information about how to download the Kinetics dataset is available here.
This is not a new phenomenon for the franchise. Many players feel that Company of Heroes 2 became saturated with maphack users, leading to a decline in its competitive scene. The fear is that CoH3 is following the same trajectory. The conversation on community hubs often devolves into a state of learned helplessness, with players accepting cheating as an inevitable part of the online RTS experience.
Relic Entertainment uses an to handle these cases. While players frequently express frustration over the speed of bans, the developer has issued "ban waves" and recently adjusted the system to be more aggressive.
) the moment they come into potential range, despite being outside the normal vision radius. Community and Developer Response Relic Entertainment relies on a combination of anti-cheat systems coh3 maphack
: Moving units to the exact spot that avoids a hidden minefield or flanking an MG-42 in a building without ever having spotted it first. The State of Anti-Cheat (2026)
user requests a long article about "coh3 maphack". I need to cover its definition, usage, prevalence, community impact, technical aspects, anti-cheat measures, player experiences, and future outlook. I'll follow the search plan in two rounds. Round One involves initial searches for general information, reports, community discussions, anti-cheat systems, technical insights, developer statements, and player experiences. I'll execute the search operations as specified. search results for "coh3 maphack" show some potentially relevant results, but not all are directly about CoH3 maphack. The results for "Company of Heroes 3 cheats map hack 2026" show trainers and mods, but not necessarily maphacks. The Reddit search results show some discussions about maphacking in RTS games, but not specifically CoH3. The search for "coh3 maphacker detection anti-cheat" didn't return specific results for CoH3. The search for "Relic Entertainment CoH3 anti-cheat update 2025" shows some results, including a Bilibili video about cheats in CoH3 and a forum post about Denuvo removal. The search for "coh3 maphack cheat forum exploit" shows some general information about maphacks, but not specific to CoH3. The search for "coh3 maphack player experience complaint" shows some results, but not directly about maphack complaints. The search for "Company of Heroes 3 anti-cheat system technical" shows some results about anti-cheat technologies, but not specifically CoH3. Overall, the search results are somewhat fragmented. I need to extract the most relevant information and structure the article. I will now open some of the most promising results to gather detailed information. search results are limited. I found some relevant information: a user profile on coh2.org mentioning map hackers, a Chinese article about a trainer with map hack functionality, a Reddit discussion about the technical impossibility of eliminating map hacking, a Bilibili article about the reporting system and anti-cheat in CoH3, an article about Denuvo removal, and another about Denuvo removal. These provide some insights. I will now proceed to Round Two: deeper searches for specific topics like "Relic CoH3 anti-cheat system", "CoH3 replay system cheat detection", "CoH3 community ban maphack", "ESEA Faceit CoH3", "Relic CoH3 cheating problem", "CoH3 fog of war exploit", "CoH3 maphacker Reddit evidence", "Relic Entertainment cheating statement 2025", and "CoH3 anti-cheat 2025 update". I will execute these searches. search results for "Relic CoH3 anti-cheat system" show some relevant pages, including a Steam community page about reporting, sanctions, and appeals, and a gamereplays.org page about a reporting system. For "Company of Heroes 3 replay system cheat detection", the results are mostly technical documentation and cheat engine tables, not directly relevant. For "Company of Heroes 3 community ban maphack", the results include a Steam community page about reporting and sanctions. For "Relic Entertainment cheating Company of Heroes 3", the results include a help page about reporting, sanctions, and appeals. For "fog of war exploit Company of Heroes 3", the results are not very relevant. For "Reddit CoH3 maphacker evidence", the results include some coh2.org posts. For "Relic Entertainment anti-cheat 2025 Company of Heroes 3", the results are mostly about Denuvo removal, not anti-cheat. Overall, the available information is limited. I will now structure the article based on the available information. The article will include an introduction, what maphack is and its features, prevalence and community impact, the technical arms race, player experiences, detection and reporting, combatting maphack, future outlook, and a conclusion. I will use the available sources to support the content. I will cite sources where appropriate. The Shadow Over the Battlefield: Understanding Maphacks in Company of Heroes 3 This is not a new phenomenon for the franchise
In a standard match of Company of Heroes 3, the fog of war hides enemy units, structures, and movements unless your own units have a direct line of sight. A maphack bypasses this restriction by doing the following: Making the entire map visible.
Assuming you're referring to Company of Heroes (CoH) and similar games: The conversation on community hubs often devolves into
For games like Company of Heroes, creating or modifying maps involves using tools provided by the game developers or third-party software. A "maphack" could refer to modifications made to a game map, potentially to change gameplay elements, aesthetics, or to create custom scenarios.
This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later.
to disable the "Free Camera" and view the match from the suspected player's perspective. Submit Evidence
1. Possible to use ImageNet checkpoints?
We allow finetuning from public ImageNet checkpoints for the supervised track -- but a link to the specific checkpoint should be provided with each submission.
2. Possible to use optical flow?
Flow can be used as long as not trained on external datasets, except if they are synthetic.
3. Can we train on test data without labels (e.g. transductive)?
No.
4. Can we use semantic class label information?
Yes, for the supervised track.
5. Will there be special tracks for methods using fewer FLOPs / small models or just RGB vs RGB+Audio in the self-supervised track?
We will ask participants to provide the total number of model parameters and the modalities used and plan to create special mentions for those doing well in each setting, but not specific tracks.